HARRY POTTER AND THE CHAMBER
OF SECRETS
Rated PG - Running Time: 2:41 - Released 11/15/02
As a film critic, I am certainly thankful that Harry Potter-mania
has replaced Pokémon-mania during the last few years; while
Im not what you would call a devoted Harry fan, the films
featuring him are leagues better than those mind-numbing Pikachu-fests
of a few years ago. Needless to say, Chris Columbuss Harry
Potter And The Chamber Of Secrets, the second in J.K. Rowlings
projected 7-episode series about everybodys favorite adolescent
wizard (the 5th of which is now reportedly finished) and the first
sequel to last years Harry
Potter And The Sorcerers Stone, adapted for the
screen by Steven Kloves, is no less magical, no less engaging,
and no less kid-pleasing than its record-breaking predecessor.
Its also no shorter; in fact its running time, at a whopping
161 minutes, is ten minutes longer than Sorcerers
Stone, which I felt was already too long for any film aimed
at elementary school-age kids.
Re-convening pretty much the entire cast of Sorcerers
Stone, and adding a few notable new names to the cast, Chamber
begins with Harrys second year at that venerable wand-waving
institution, Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. Although
he is visited at home by a short, large-eyed creature named Dobby
the house elf (a digitally animated creation with the voice of
Toby Jones), who tells him not to return to Hogwarts because his
life is in danger, Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe), now 12 years
old, decides as usual to ignore the advice offered him and sneaks
back to school with his best friend, the timid but affable Ron
Weasley (Rupert Grint), using Rons familys flying
car. There he is re-united with other fellow sophomores like the
ever-studious-but-still-has-time-for-mischief Hermione Granger
(Emma Watson) and arch-enemy Draco Malfoy (Tom Felton), whose
father Lucius (Jason Isaacs) has also shown up to help Draco and
his pals torment the good guys. Also introduced is a new professor
named Gilderoy Lockhart (Kenneth Branagh), a world-famous and
hopelessly vain heartthrob wizard who has been assigned to teach
the academys Defense Against The Dark Arts classes, but
spends most of his time signing autographed pictures for his throngs
of admiring fans.
Soon after arriving at school, Harry starts to notice some
weird things happening, and its not just from eating magic
chocolate frogs. Certain students are being petrified, messages
are being written on the walls in blood, and rumor has it that
the mysterious chamber of secrets, which was installed
centuries ago by malevolent school co-founder Salazar Slytherin
to trap non-pureblood wizards, has been opened. Not only this,
but some people think Harry is responsible, like Groundskeeper
Argus Filch (David Bradley) and surly Prof. Severus Snape (Alan
Rickman). Whatever the reason, the chambers opening could
spell the end of Hogwarts, at least according to Headmaster Albus
Dumbledore (the late Richard Harris, whose recent death will obviously
preclude him from appearing in future sequels). Harry, Ron, and
Hermione must figure out whats going on and fast, or their
beloved school will be forced to close its doors.
Ive not read any of the Harry Potter series (yet), but
Im told that each book is exponentially more complex than
the last; I suppose I should be thankful this movie is only 10
minutes longer than Sorcerers Stone, considering
the mountain of new characters and exposition that are required.
But it does concern me, if all seven of the ever-more complicated
books are to be produced as motion pictures, and each is as meticulously
faithful to its source text as the first two have been, that the
ensuing films can do nothing but become more and more ponderous,
more filled with every bit of inconsequential dialogue and every
minor action scene, and more minutes in length. Perhaps the seventh
and final film will be measured in days rather than hours. Perhaps
viewers will have to bring a change of clothes or book a room
in a local hotel when they buy their tickets. Is it not ever possible
to edit these Rowling tomes, or is this slavish dedication to
preserving every image absolutely necessary? I know, I know...Crusty
critic chastises Chamber with compulsive clock-watching.
But Im not just whining about a sore butt here. Im
talking about the need for more efficient editing, the
need to resist overindulgence, on the part of Columbus and his
crew. Im as thrilled by the HP movies as the next guy, but
I would be unequivocally delighted if they all managed to be 2
hours long. And they could do it if they tried.
Chamber Of Secrets is of course rife with amazing magical
effects, clever, witty dialogue, and plenty of action. The acting
has improved infinitesimally among the three leading teens, and
the technique of the adult cast, including not only those named
above but Dame Maggie Smith as Prof. McGonagall and Robbie Coltrane
as Gamekeeper Hagrid, is uniformly above reproach. And we are
treated to such technical wonders as giant spiders (very similar
to those in this summers Eight
Legged Freaks, but not as funny), an angry whomping
willow tree, and an immense basilisk that looks like a giant
iguana with no legs. A magic diary that answers questions written
in it, another action-packed quidditch game, Cornish pixies, screaming
mandrake plants. Neato. But is it all necessary.
Chamber is beautifully rendered, using the combined talents of cinematographer Roger Pratt, production designer Stuart Craig, costume designers Lindy Hemming and Michael O'Conner, and all the others involved in this immense production. If you liked Sorcerers Stone, and you can stay awake, there is no doubt this will please you. So bring an extra seat cushion, go to the bathroom beforehand, pop a No-Doz, and enjoy. ****