CHICAGO
Rated PG-13 - Running Time: 1:53 - Released 12/27/02
One gets the sense that there is a newor at least a renewedtrend
in Hollywood: the revival of big-budget Broadway musicals as feature
films, starring established serious actors whom we
had no idea could sing or dance. Its been a while since
the likes of Oklahoma!, South Pacific, and The
Music Man were playing on the large screen, but after the
phenomenal success of last years Moulin
Rouge (which was written as an original film, but had
all the trappings and over-the-top performances of a standard
product of the Great White Way), and the similar reaction to this
new Rob Marshall-directed version of Chicago, which copped
three Golden Globes last week in the musical/comedy category [best
picture, best actor (Richard Gere), and best actress (Renée
Zellweger)], and was nominated for several more, its safe
to say there may be more of the same in the near future. Perhaps
in the next few years well see My Fair Lady starring
Jennifer Love Hewitt and Robin Williams, or West Side Story
with Jennifer Lopez and Antonio Banderas. Maybe even the all-nude
musical Oh! Calcutta!, starring Elizabeth Hurley, Salma
Hayek, Halle Berry, and Britney Spears. Hey, a movie critic can
dream, cant he?
Anyway, this film (adapted by screenwriter Bill Condon from
the 1975 Broadway version by Fred Ebb and Bob Fosse, which itself
was based on the play by Maurine Dallas Watkins) has all the sparkle,
all the razzle-dazzle, and all the old-time Broadway charm you
could hope for, with virtuosic performances not only by Zellweger
and Gere, but by supporting performers Catherine Zeta-Jones, Queen
Latifah, and John C. Reilly, who all, as the credits make perfectly
clear, performed their own singing and dancing for the films
numerous musical numbers. Also deserving of praise is first-time
feature film director Marshall for his energetic production values
and his choreography, the level of which could make or break a
film like this, and cinematographer Dion Beebe for assembling
it all within the lens. I have never seen a stage production of
Chicago, but I daresay I could not have enjoyed it more
live than I did in this version. When actors who usually play
more subtle roles are up there hoofing it and belting out Broadway
melodies, you cant help but feel youre getting your
moneys worth.
Roxie Hart (Zellweger) is a bored housewife in 1920s Chicago
who knows she could make it in vaudeville if someone would just
discover her. In fact, despite the fact that shes only marginally
talented, she sees her entire life as a lavish musical (starring
her, of course), with every person she meets playing a supporting
part. A sort of singing and dancing version of Walter Mitty, she
is far more talented in her optimistic fantasy world than in real
life, but it is the fantasies that we see played out as she imagines
them, with director Marshall deftly cutting back and forth between
her glitzy version of events and the often grim reality of the
situation. When her extramarital lover (Dominic West) reneges
on his promise to get her a job at the Onyx club, she shoots him
dead and is promptly arrested and sent to a womens prison,
where she meets several other man-killing females including famous
Onyx performer Velma Kelly (Zeta-Jones). With the financial help
of her ignorant doormat husband (Reilly), she seeks the counsel
of famous attorney Billy Flynn (Gere), who, according to the openly
corrupt prison warden (Latifah), has never lost a case. But Flynn
is also Velmas lawyer, which sets up a conflict between
the reigning nightclub queen and her up-and-coming wannabe replacement.
Flynn, who prizes celebrity even more than his standard $5,000
retainer fee, teaches Roxie that to win favor among the public
(and the jury), youve got to razzle-dazzle emthat
life is just one big showwhich, of course, fits perfectly
well with Roxies take on life anyway. Also present are Christine
Baranski as the local tabloid reporter and Lucy Liu as another
popular murderess who threatens to steal the spotlight.
Americas tastes in entertainment seem to be ever-changing, and the movie industry tries its best to keep up in whatever way will earn the most dollars. Perhaps the late 20th/early 21st century popularity of gross-out comedy and risk-oriented reality programming has finally begun to wane (please, please ), so now the pendulum begins to swing back toward the classics. Whether Chicago is an early example of an emerging trend or simply a welcome anomaly, it is welcome indeed, reaffirming the old-fashioned notion that film performers have to actually have talent, and use it, in order to succeed. ****½